Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31


93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011

Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-S200 versus Olympus TG-610, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-S200 was revealed 5 months earlier than the TG-610 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S200 scores against the TG-610 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Olympus TG-610. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus TG-610
EX-S200 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Casio EX-S200
TG-610 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-610
EX-S200 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2010 | ![]() | January 2011 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Olympus TG-610 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 against the TG-610.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and TG-610 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The image underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and TG-610.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you have to take the launch date of the cameras into account.

Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus TG-610 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $223 |