Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Pentax WG-10, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was brought out 3 years earlier than the WG-10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-10 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up against the WG-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Pentax WG-10. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Pentax WG-10
| EX-S200 | WG-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-10 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Pentax WG-10
| EX-S200 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Pentax WG-10 has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 versus Pentax WG-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the WG-10.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-10 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and WG-10.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Pentax |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 0.7fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 1.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $0 |