Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-S200 versus Pentax WG-3, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Pentax. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was launched 4 years before the WG-3 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades versus the WG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Pentax WG-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Pentax WG-3
EX-S200 | WG-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-S200
WG-3 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2013 | August 2010 | More modern by 36 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Pentax WG-3
EX-S200 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 comes with exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 versus Pentax WG-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 and the WG-3.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and WG-3 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WG-3.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Pentax WG-3 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Pentax WG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Pentax WG-3 |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $300 |