Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014

Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-S200 versus Pentax XG-1, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the XG-1 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-S200 was revealed 5 years earlier than the XG-1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 scores vs the XG-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Pentax XG-1. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Pentax XG-1
EX-S200 | XG-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Casio EX-S200
XG-1 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Pentax XG-1
EX-S200 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Pentax XG-1 has proportions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S200 versus Pentax XG-1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the XG-1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and XG-1 is 96 and 66 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The graphic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and XG-1.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Pentax XG-1 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Pentax XG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Pentax XG-1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2014-07-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 567 grams (1.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | LB-060 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $599 |