Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was launched 12 months later than the CX2 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-S200 scores vs the CX2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh CX2
| EX-S200 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Casio EX-S200
| CX2 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX2
| EX-S200 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 features outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 vs the CX2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and CX2.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-S200 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $341 |