Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX3, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was revealed 2 months after the CX3 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-S200 grades versus the CX3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-S200 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-S200
| CX3 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-S200 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 comes with external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the CX3.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and CX3 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and CX3.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $329 |