Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Ricoh G900 front
Portability
89
Imaging
47
Features
46
Overall
46

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Ricoh G900
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2018
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S200 was released 8 years earlier than the G900 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the G900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh G900

 EX-S200 G900 

Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-S200

 G900 EX-S200 
AnnouncedFebruary 2018August 2010More modern by 91 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900

 EX-S200 G900 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 against the G900.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and G900 is 96 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and G900.

As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh G900 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography information
Ricoh G900 Portrait photography information
35
has manual focus
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
45
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Ricoh G900 Street photography factors
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
60
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than others in class (247g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh G900 as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
54
image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (20MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
better than average battery (340 shots)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S200
Travel photography with Ricoh G900
65
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
70
better than average battery (340 per charge)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
more heavy than others in class (247 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography information
Ricoh G900 Landscape photography information
42
has manual focus
reasonably wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
56
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (20MP)
environment sealing
better than average battery (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging features
Ricoh G900 Vlogging features
29
reasonably wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
32
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone port
more heavy than others in class (247 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Ricoh G900
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Ricoh G900
Type Ultracompact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-08-03 2018-02-21
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 50 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 5.50 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Flash on, flash off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840x2160
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Supports FlashAir SD cards
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 lb) 247g (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 340 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $0 $752