Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was released 8 years earlier than the G900 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the G900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh G900
EX-S200 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-S200
G900 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | August 2010 | More modern by 91 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900
EX-S200 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 against the G900.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and G900 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and G900.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh G900 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh G900 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $752 |