Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is fairly similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was manufactured 3 years before the GR which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 grades against the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GR
EX-S200 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-S200
GR | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | August 2010 | Newer by 32 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GR
EX-S200 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 offers exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the GR.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GR.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR will deliver extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $0 | $971 |