Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Released April 2013
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is fairly similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-S200 was manufactured 3 years before the GR which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 grades against the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GR

 EX-S200 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-S200

 GR EX-S200 
ReleasedApril 2013August 2010Newer by 32 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GR

 EX-S200 GR 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 offers exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the GR.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and GR is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GR.

As you can tell, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR will deliver extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR Portrait photography factors
35
manual focus
MP count decent (14MP)
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
74
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000 seconds)
good resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography features
Ricoh GR Street photography features
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average (245 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Sports photography details
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
45
good resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography information
Ricoh GR Travel photography information
65
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
71
lighter than average (245g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
42
manual focus
reasonably wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
61
focusing manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Ricoh GR
29
reasonably wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic support
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (245g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
lack of mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GR
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Ricoh GR
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Ricoh GR
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-08-03 2013-04-17
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 300s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $0 $971