Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was manufactured 18 months before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-S200 scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| EX-S200 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-S200
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| EX-S200 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 comes with external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 96 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-02 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $871 |