Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f00/27f002f9b360b27dd43a21dfef0ba4e91344bfbc" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front"
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is relatively close but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-S200 was manufactured 12 months prior to the GXR Mount A12 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the GXR Mount A12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-S200 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-S200
GXR Mount A12 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-S200 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 against the GXR Mount A12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40778/40778860b621ae39651a59b11050c1414658303a" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and GXR Mount A12 is 96 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/245ea/245ea9d418164d66fd612d66a4e2d2447c5a0ea7" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GXR Mount A12.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-S200 will render extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf81c/bf81ce1369c30806ed176efaa2c6faa858bba4ab" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4d3/bd4d3d52160693b54495860a78e112b9ac864a57" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 370 grams (0.82 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $349 |