Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-S200 was revealed 5 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-S200 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-S200

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-S200 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-S200 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedAugust 2010March 2010Similar age
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-S200 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
35
has manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
36
manual focus
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S200
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (355g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography information
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have liveview
low frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography details
65
good MP (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
60
lighter than competition (355 grams)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
42
has manual focus
relatively wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
47
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
29
relatively wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
28
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355g)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-08-03 2010-03-18
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 180s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $0 $349