Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was revealed 5 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-S200 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-S200
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-S200 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | March 2010 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-S200 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $349 |