Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-S200 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-30 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 grades against the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-S200 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-S200
WG-30 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | August 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-S200 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 versus the WG-30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-30 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and WG-30.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to give you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $428 |