Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released October 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-S200 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-30 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-S200 grades against the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-30

 EX-S200 WG-30 
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-S200

 WG-30 EX-S200 
ReleasedOctober 2014August 2010More modern by 50 months

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30

 EX-S200 WG-30 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 versus the WG-30.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-30 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and WG-30.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to give you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography info
35
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
35
resolution is good (16MP)
has face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S200
Street photography with Ricoh WG-30
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
61
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography factors
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
45
has image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S200
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-30
65
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
71
weather proofing
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography details
42
focusing manually
reasonably wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
43
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather proofing
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-30 Vlogging highlights
29
reasonably wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
33
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
has face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Ricoh WG-30
Class Ultracompact Waterproof
Launched 2010-08-03 2014-10-09
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 50 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 lbs) 192g (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $428