Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was revealed 5 years prior to the WG-30W and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-S200 matches up against the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh WG-30W. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-S200 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-30W | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-S200 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 provides outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-30W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the WG-30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WG-30W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and WG-30W.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $280 |