Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-S200 was launched 4 years before the WG-4 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-S200 grades vs the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-S200 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-4 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-S200 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 against the WG-4.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and WG-4.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $330 |