Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-S200 scores against the WG-5 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| EX-S200 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-5 GPS | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 55 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| EX-S200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 features external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The picture below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and WG-5 GPS.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $500 |