Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2017
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-S200 was released 7 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-S200 scores versus the WG-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-50

 EX-S200 WG-50 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-S200

 WG-50 EX-S200 
IntroducedMay 2017August 2010Fresher by 82 months

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-50

 EX-S200 WG-50 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the WG-50.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and WG-50.

Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography advice
35
manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
42
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography factors
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography features
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
49
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography factors
65
resolution is good (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
71
environment sealing
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography factors
42
manual focus
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
48
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-50
29
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
33
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-50
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Ricoh WG-50
Type Ultracompact Waterproof
Launched 2010-08-03 2017-05-24
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 50 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction On, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 pounds) 193g (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $280