Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was released 7 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-S200 scores versus the WG-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-S200 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-50 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 82 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-S200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the WG-50.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and WG-50.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $280 |