Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was revealed 10 years prior to the WG-70 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-S200 scores against the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-S200 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-70 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 115 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-S200 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 and the WG-70.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WG-70.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to give you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $280 |