Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-S200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-S200
| WG-M1 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-S200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has got outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 vs the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you may want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-S200 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $2,000 |
