Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL10
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was introduced 18 months after the CL5 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S200 scores against the CL5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung CL5. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung CL5
| EX-S200 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-S200
| CL5 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung CL5
| EX-S200 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 offers outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 against the CL5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and CL5 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and CL5.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Casio EX-S200 will give extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 141 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $391 |