Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung CL80 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
30
Overall
34

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2010
Samsung CL80
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Alternative Name is ST5500
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung CL80, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The EX-S200 was introduced 7 months later than the CL80 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-S200 matches up against the CL80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung CL80

 EX-S200 CL80 
AnnouncedAugust 2010January 2010More recent by 7 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-S200

 CL80 EX-S200 
Display sizing3.7"2.7"Larger display (+1")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung CL80

 EX-S200 CL80 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 features physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung CL80 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 versus the CL80.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and CL80 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and CL80.

All in all, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you should expect comparable quality of photographs but you really should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher EX-S200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography advice
Samsung CL80 Portrait photography advice
35
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
28
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography advice
Samsung CL80 Street photography advice
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
60
image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition in class (160 grams)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography information
Samsung CL80 Sports photography information
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
38
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography highlights
Samsung CL80 Travel photography highlights
65
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
60
features focus by touch
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (160g)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Samsung CL80
42
you can focus manually
rather wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
37
screen larger than average (3.7")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging details
Samsung CL80 Vlogging details
29
rather wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
27
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
heavier than competition in class (160g)
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung CL80
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung CL80
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung CL80
Also called - ST5500
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-08-03 2010-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4334 x 3256
Max native ISO 3200 4800
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3.7 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lb) 160 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $0 $400