Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was manufactured 17 months prior to the DV300F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-S200 grades vs the DV300F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung DV300F
| EX-S200 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-S200
| DV300F | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung DV300F
| EX-S200 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 versus the DV300F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and DV300F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The visual below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and DV300F.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung DV300F to give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 133 grams (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $200 |