Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
68 Imaging
43 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed January 2006
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung GX-1S, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-S200 was announced 4 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-S200 scores versus the GX-1S with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung GX-1S
| EX-S200 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 | January 2006 | More modern by 56 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-S200
| GX-1S | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung GX-1S
| EX-S200 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 features outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 versus the GX-1S.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and GX-1S is 96 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Casio EX-S200 will produce more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $850 |