Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung GX-1S front
Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Released August 2010
Samsung GX-1S
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Revealed January 2006
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview

Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung GX-1S, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-S200 was announced 4 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-S200 scores versus the GX-1S with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung GX-1S

 EX-S200 GX-1S 
RevealedAugust 2010January 2006More modern by 56 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k210kSharper display (+20k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-S200

 GX-1S EX-S200 

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung GX-1S

 EX-S200 GX-1S 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 features outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 versus the GX-1S.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and GX-1S is 96 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GX-1S.

As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Casio EX-S200 will produce more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
Samsung GX-1S Portrait photography factors
35
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
50
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (6 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Street photography camera
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
60
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (605 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
38
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (6MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Travel photography camera
65
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
52
lighter than competitors in class (605g)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (6MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography details
Samsung GX-1S Landscape photography details
42
manual focus
quite wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
46
has manual focus
swap lenses (Pentax KAF mount)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (6MP)
no Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Vlogging camera
29
quite wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
9
can't shoot video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung GX-1S
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung GX-1S
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung GX-1S
Type Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Released 2010-08-03 2006-01-16
Body design Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 6 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 3008 x 2008
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 11
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Pentax KAF
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Available lenses - 151
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 210k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 pounds) 605 gr (1.33 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC card
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $850