Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed January 2006
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung GX-1S, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was announced 4 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-S200 scores versus the GX-1S with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung GX-1S
| EX-S200 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 | January 2006 | More modern by 56 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-S200
| GX-1S | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung GX-1S
| EX-S200 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 features outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 versus the GX-1S.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and GX-1S is 96 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Casio EX-S200 will produce more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $850 |