Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-S200 was announced 3 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 3G and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 grades vs the Galaxy Camera 3G in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-S200 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-S200
Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
Display size | 4.8" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+2.1") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-S200 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the Galaxy Camera 3G.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 4.8 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $0 | $606 |