Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
![Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200/Casio-EX-S200-front.jpg)
![Samsung NX200 front Samsung NX200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-NX200.jpg)
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Updated by Samsung NX210
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX200, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The EX-S200 was brought out 19 months earlier than the NX200 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 grades versus the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung NX200
EX-S200 | NX200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Casio EX-S200
NX200 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX200
EX-S200 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 offers outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 vs the NX200.
![Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Samsung-NX200-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and NX200 is 96 and 90 respectively.
![Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Samsung-NX200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and NX200.
All in all, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX200 will give greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Samsung-NX200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-S200-vs-Samsung-NX200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 223 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $818 |