Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
63
Features
62
Overall
62

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Released May 2014
  • Superseded the Samsung NX2000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-S200 was launched 4 years prior to the NX3000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 matches up against the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung NX3000

 EX-S200 NX3000 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-S200

 NX3000 EX-S200 
ReleasedMay 2014August 2010Fresher by 46 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX3000

 EX-S200 NX3000 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has specifications of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 against the NX3000.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and NX3000 is 96 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and NX3000.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
Samsung NX3000 Portrait photography factors
35
has manual focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
77
focusing manually
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S200
Street photography with Samsung NX3000
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
81
screen tilts
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average (230 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography factors
Samsung NX3000 Sports photography factors
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
56
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
low frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Samsung NX3000 Travel photography details
65
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
68
lighter than average (230 grams)
good megapixels (20MP)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung NX3000 Landscape photography highlights
42
has manual focus
rather wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
72
focusing manually
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
good sized screen (3")
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging highlights
Samsung NX3000 Vlogging highlights
29
rather wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone support
34
supports face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (230g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
no mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX3000
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung NX3000
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung NX3000
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-08-03 2014-05-26
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 50 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 35
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Total lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 461 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132g (0.29 lb) 230g (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 B740
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $897