Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung NX300M front
Portability
86
Imaging
62
Features
73
Overall
66

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2010
Samsung NX300M
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung NX300M, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The EX-S200 was manufactured 3 years before the NX300M which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the NX300M in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung NX300M

 EX-S200 NX300M 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Casio EX-S200

 NX300M EX-S200 
LaunchedJanuary 2013August 2010More modern by 29 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3.3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution768k230kSharper screen (+538k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX300M

 EX-S200 NX300M 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 comes with exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung NX300M in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 and the NX300M.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and NX300M is 96 and 86 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The picture below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and NX300M.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX300M will give more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography info
Samsung NX300M Portrait photography info
35
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
77
focusing manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography highlights
Samsung NX300M Street photography highlights
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
80
tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
offers focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography features
Samsung NX300M Sports photography features
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
72
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000s)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX300M Travel photography highlights
65
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
66
offers focus by touch
MP count good (20MP)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography information
Samsung NX300M Landscape photography information
42
you can focus manually
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
72
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen is a good size (3.3 inch)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Samsung NX300M
29
relatively wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
33
has touchscreen
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
missing external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung NX300M
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung NX300M
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung NX300M
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2010-08-03 2013-01-03
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 DRIMe IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 50 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 247
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Number of lenses - 32
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7 inch 3.3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 768 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/6000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 9.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lbs) 331 grams (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 BP1130
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $0 $699