Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung PL200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was released within a month of the PL200 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up against the PL200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-S200 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-S200
| PL200 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung PL200
| EX-S200 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | July 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 has physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung PL200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 vs the PL200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and PL200 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and PL200.
All in all, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you should really take the launch date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 170 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $0 |