Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was brought out 20 months later than the SL102 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 grades against the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-S200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-S200
| SL102 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung SL102
| EX-S200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has got external measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 vs the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and SL102.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-S200 to result in extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $130 |
