Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is ES15
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-S200 was introduced 18 months later than the SL30 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL30 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-S200 scores versus the SL30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung SL30. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung SL30
EX-S200 | SL30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 18 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Casio EX-S200
SL30 | EX-S200 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung SL30
EX-S200 | SL30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 features external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung SL30 has dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the SL30.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and SL30 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and SL30.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-S200 to give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung SL30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung SL30 |
Also referred to as | - | ES15 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $0 | $93 |