Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed April 2011
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was brought out 8 months earlier than the ST93 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-S200 grades vs the ST93 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung ST93. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung ST93
| EX-S200 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-S200
| ST93 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2011 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 8 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung ST93
| EX-S200 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 against the ST93.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and ST93 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The visual here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and ST93.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung ST93 to provide greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung ST93 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 110 grams (0.24 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | - |
