Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
42
Overall
39

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-S200 was manufactured 17 months earlier than the WB150F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-S200 scores against the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB150F

 EX-S200 WB150F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-S200

 WB150F EX-S200 
RevealedJanuary 2012August 2010Fresher by 17 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB150F

 EX-S200 WB150F 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 and the WB150F.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB150F is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WB150F.

Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP and you should expect comparable quality of files however you really should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The older EX-S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography info
35
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
42
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
comes with face detection focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Street photography camera
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (188 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Sports photography highlights
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
51
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB150F Travel photography factors
65
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (27mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than competitors in class (188g)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (432mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Landscape photography camera
42
focusing manually
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
49
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB150F Vlogging highlights
29
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic support
32
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competitors in class (188 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB150F
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung WB150F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung WB150F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-08-03 2012-01-09
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132g (0.29 lb) 188g (0.41 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $0 $230