Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB2200F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-S200 was announced 4 years before the WB2200F and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades against the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB2200F

 EX-S200 WB2200F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-S200

 WB2200F EX-S200 
IntroducedJanuary 2014August 2010More recent by 41 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB2200F

 EX-S200 WB2200F 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 comes with physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 vs the WB2200F.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and WB2200F.

Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB2200F to give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography highlights
35
has manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
44
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography information
Samsung WB2200F Street photography information
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competitors (708g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography factors
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
53
great zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
features tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography highlights
65
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
51
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (20mm)
long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (708g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Samsung WB2200F
42
has manual focus
fairly wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
46
you can focus manually
pretty wide (20mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Samsung WB2200F
29
fairly wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have mic socket
25
pretty wide (20mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competitors (708 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB2200F
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung WB2200F
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung WB2200F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-08-03 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 50 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 1/8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lb) 708 grams (1.56 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $0 $599