Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2010
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB350F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-S200 was brought out 4 years before the WB350F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-S200 grades versus the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB350F

 EX-S200 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-S200

 WB350F EX-S200 
ReleasedJanuary 2014August 2010More recent by 41 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB350F

 EX-S200 WB350F 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 vs the WB350F.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and WB350F.

As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to result in extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography information
35
focusing manually
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
40
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Street photography highlights
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (276 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Sports photography camera
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
65
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than competitors (276g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
no Timelapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography details
42
focusing manually
pretty wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
50
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging details
Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
29
pretty wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
34
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB350F
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung WB350F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-08-03 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 50 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132g (0.29 pounds) 276g (0.61 pounds)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $0 $260