Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2010
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-S200 was released 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 scores vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-S200 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-S200

 WB35F EX-S200 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014August 2010More modern by 41 months

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-S200 WB35F 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurements
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 against the WB35F.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WB35F.

Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
35
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
37
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no manual mode
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography details
Samsung WB35F Street photography details
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S200
Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography information
Samsung WB35F Travel photography information
65
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (27mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.2)
70
lighter than others (194 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography highlights
42
manual focus
fairly wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
43
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB35F Vlogging advice
29
fairly wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic support
31
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung WB35F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung WB35F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-08-03 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lb) 194 gr (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $0 $130