Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-S200 was released 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 scores vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-S200 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-S200
WB35F | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB35F
EX-S200 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 against the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ebb1/3ebb1b095451497809dca87ad6aa327a4d9a805b" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0728/a07281995cf32ae0974db25db7531f708da22fdc" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WB35F.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cb5a/3cb5ad9a0ac11577ae632905a4b01341992f1b21" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a35c/7a35cdd6962811c8d14a3b28484f26bae3675ff0" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $0 | $130 |