Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB750, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-S200 was unveiled 13 months before the WB750 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 scores vs the WB750 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung WB750. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-S200 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-S200
| WB750 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB750
| EX-S200 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 comes with outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 vs the WB750.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB750 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WB750.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to give extra detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $339 |