Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB850F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was revealed 17 months prior to the WB850F making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the WB850F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-S200 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-S200
| WB850F | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 17 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-S200 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 comes with exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB850F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 against the WB850F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and WB850F is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and WB850F.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB850F to result in extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $599 |
