Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-S200 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-S200 was manufactured 18 months earlier than the DP2 Merrill which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 grades versus the DP2 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| EX-S200 | DP2 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Casio EX-S200
| DP2 Merrill | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 18 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| EX-S200 | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has got physical measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 and the DP2 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and DP2 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The image here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and DP2 Merrill.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer you extra detail due to its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640x480 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $931 |