Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-S200 was unveiled 4 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-S200 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-S200

 DP2 Quattro EX-S200 
ReleasedFebruary 2014August 2010More modern by 43 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-S200 DP2 Quattro 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography features
35
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
77
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
48
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
65
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
53
good resolution (20 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
42
has manual focus
quite wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
59
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
29
quite wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
9
no video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-08-03 2014-02-13
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132g (0.29 pounds) 395g (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots One One
Retail price $0 $931