Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-S200 was unveiled 4 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-S200 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-S200 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-S200
DP2 Quattro | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-S200 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-S200 versus the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/531bb/531bbb1204f67849a7b2fd2a04b3eb818d19ae37" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9588a/9588af8300d1f32dfd7c4313b96e35b7d587ab86" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45fa1/45fa1cb5f5d7f9c78e6d0022bf018e0d8196c343" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f745/1f74530c9d575aae4fb4faa0991f4dab4aa5128c" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $931 |