Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53260/53260c3f32c0116ecea3ddbd9713300719affe62" alt="Sigma DP3 Merrill front Sigma DP3 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-S200 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-S200 was announced 3 years earlier than the DP3 Merrill and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-S200 grades vs the DP3 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
EX-S200 | DP3 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Casio EX-S200
DP3 Merrill | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 29 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
EX-S200 | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 provides external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 against the DP3 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5859/a58592f1433a3b2acd3bab1efc1914a77ea2260c" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and DP3 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ec2a/4ec2a4c2a6ac6cf51d88ebfc885a4df1d88943a9" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and DP3 Merrill.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give you greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15a5f/15a5ff08b12e1873e04476f9ffd1b9e79aebc702" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5778a/5778ac4ff545b0a8f769072c14b38391a0058808" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $1,353 |