Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Sigma SD10, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was manufactured 6 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-S200 scores versus the SD10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-S200 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | March 2004 | Fresher by 78 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-S200
| SD10 | EX-S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma SD10
| EX-S200 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 features physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 versus Sigma SD10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 vs the SD10.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and SD10 is 96 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The photograph here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and SD10.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Casio EX-S200 will result in more detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-S200 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma SD10 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 950 grams (2.09 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $198 |
