Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696e8/696e8b342790bcee8506262570e31de4472938f0" alt="Sigma SD15 front Sigma SD15 front"
59 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Old Model is Sigma SD14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma SD15, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-S200 was introduced 6 months after the SD15 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-S200 matches up against the SD15 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sigma SD15. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma SD15
EX-S200 | SD15 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Casio EX-S200
SD15 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma SD15
EX-S200 | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Same generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD15 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") having a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma SD15 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 vs the SD15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a1a/a3a1a4a5a0c5fef567c540b2a1512f01ac51625a" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and SD15 is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25139/2513929cf9743ba371425a7e5e110291c986c8cf" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The picture here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and SD15.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-S200 will render more detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c608c/c608c5ade952f2545ebbc4300dc1d275c82d9395" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32175/321756b411522899af4407ac8b99f93bcb041122" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma SD15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma SD15 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 750g (1.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $1,500 |