Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sigma fp front
Portability
84
Imaging
76
Features
79
Overall
77

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Sigma fp
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
  • Released July 2019
  • Replacement is Sigma fp L
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Overview

Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and fp (25MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) have totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S200 was manufactured 10 years prior to the fp and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades vs the fp with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma fp

 EX-S200 fp 

Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Casio EX-S200

 fp EX-S200 
ReleasedJuly 2019August 2010More recent by 108 months
Display size3.2"2.7"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution2100k230kClearer display (+1870k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma fp

 EX-S200 fp 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 vs the fp.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and fp is 96 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and fp.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sigma fp will render more detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-S200
Portrait photography with Sigma fp
35
has manual focus
resolution is good (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
85
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is great (25 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
Sigma fp as a Street photography camera
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
77
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
has focus by touch
weather sealing
above average high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S200
Sports photography with Sigma fp
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
73
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is great (25MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S200
Travel photography with Sigma fp
65
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
78
weather sealing
has focus by touch
sensor resolution is great (25MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma fp Landscape photography highlights
42
has manual focus
decently wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
83
you can focus manually
change lenses (Leica L mount)
screen is a decent size (3.2")
sensor resolution is great (25MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging information
Sigma fp Vlogging information
29
decently wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic port
37
touchscreen capability
provides face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has mic socket
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sigma fp
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sigma fp
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sigma fp
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-08-03 2019-07-11
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 23.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 858.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 25 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Max boosted ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW format
Min boosted ISO - 6
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 49
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Leica L
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Total lenses - 30
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3.2 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 2,100k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting rate - 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None No
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 pounds) 422 gr (0.93 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 wec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $0 $2,050