Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
84 Imaging
76 Features
79 Overall
77
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Overview
Here, we are matching up the Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and fp (25MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was manufactured 10 years prior to the fp and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades vs the fp with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sigma fp. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma fp
EX-S200 | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Casio EX-S200
fp | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2019 | August 2010 | More recent by 108 months | |
Display size | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 230k | Clearer display (+1870k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma fp
EX-S200 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-S200 vs the fp.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and fp is 96 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and fp.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-S200 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sigma fp will render more detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma fp |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2019-07-11 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 30 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 2,100k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) | 422 gr (0.93 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $0 | $2,050 |