Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Released August 2010
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-S200 was brought out 6 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-S200 grades vs the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma Quattro

 EX-S200 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-S200

 Quattro EX-S200 
IntroducedFebruary 2016August 2010More modern by 67 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro

 EX-S200 Quattro 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the Quattro.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Quattro is 96 and 63 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and Quattro.

As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will offer extra detail having its extra 15MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography details
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography details
35
manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
81
you can focus manually
resolution is high (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography features
Sigma Quattro Street photography features
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Sports photography highlights
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
70
resolution is high (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-S200
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
65
good MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
55
environment proofing
resolution is high (29 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (625g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography information
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography information
42
manual focus
fairly wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
72
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
resolution is high (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
29
fairly wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic support
22
has face detect focus
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video ( pxls)
lack of microphone port
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sigma sd Quattro
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2010-08-03 2016-02-23
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.8 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lb) 625 grams (1.38 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 BP-61
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $0 $738