Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was brought out 6 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-S200 grades vs the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sigma Quattro
EX-S200 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-S200
Quattro | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | August 2010 | More modern by 67 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro
EX-S200 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 features exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-S200 and Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Quattro is 96 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and Quattro.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will offer extra detail having its extra 15MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $738 |