Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
56
Features
60
Overall
57

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Revealed August 2012
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
  • Renewed by Sony NEX-3N
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-S200 and Sony NEX-F3, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-S200 was announced 24 months before the NEX-F3 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-S200 scores against the NEX-F3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony NEX-F3

 EX-S200 NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Casio EX-S200

 NEX-F3 EX-S200 
RevealedAugust 2012August 2010Fresher by 24 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony NEX-F3

 EX-S200 NEX-F3 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Sony NEX-F3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 against the NEX-F3.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and NEX-F3 is 96 and 86 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and NEX-F3.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography factors
34
you can focus manually
decent MP (14MP)
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
73
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography advice
Sony NEX-F3 Street photography advice
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
75
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
53
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great battery (470 shots)
slow frames per second (6.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Travel photography camera
65
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (27mm)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
69
great battery (470 CIPA)
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-F3
42
you can focus manually
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
69
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
great battery (470 per charge)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Sony NEX-F3
29
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
27
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sony NEX-F3
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Make Casio Sony
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Type Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-08-03 2012-08-16
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 16000
Lowest native ISO 50 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Number of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 pounds) 314 gr (0.69 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $0 $470