Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
63 Imaging
44 Features
37 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and H300 (20MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was released 4 years earlier than the H300 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 grades vs the H300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony H300
| EX-S200 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Casio EX-S200
| H300 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony H300
| EX-S200 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-S200 and the H300.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and H300 is 96 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The visual here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and H300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony H300 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 pounds) | 590g (1.30 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $249 |