Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Launched March 2016
  • Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
  • Successor is Sony RX10 IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Sony RX10 III, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") posses different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-S200 was brought out 6 years prior to the RX10 III which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-S200 scores vs the RX10 III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony RX10 III

 EX-S200 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Casio EX-S200

 RX10 III EX-S200 
LaunchedMarch 2016August 2010More modern by 68 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 III

 EX-S200 RX10 III 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") along with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 versus the RX10 III.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and RX10 III is 96 and 53 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The image here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and RX10 III.

To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sony RX10 III will render greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography information
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography information
34
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
71
focusing manually
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Sony RX10 III Street photography factors
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
64
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
more heavy than others in class (1,051 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Sports photography highlights
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
better than average battery life (420 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Sony RX10 III Travel photography details
65
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
55
better than average battery life (420 shots)
weather sealing
MP count good (20MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (1,051 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 III
42
has manual focus
reasonably wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
63
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
better than average battery life (420 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
does not have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging info
Sony RX10 III Vlogging info
29
reasonably wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
28
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone socket
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
does not have a selfie friendly display
more heavy than others in class (1,051 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 III
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Make Casio Sony
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Class Ultracompact Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-08-03 2016-03-29
Physical type Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 50 125
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lbs) 1051 grams (2.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-120 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $0 $1,398