Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32


52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Old Model is Sony RX10 III

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") posses totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-S200 was announced 8 years earlier than the RX10 IV which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 grades vs the RX10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony RX10 IV
EX-S200 | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Casio EX-S200
RX10 IV | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2017 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 86 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1210k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV
EX-S200 | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 and the RX10 IV.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and RX10 IV is 96 and 52 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and RX10 IV.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX10 IV will produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 1095g (2.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $1,698 |