Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front
Portability
52
Imaging
53
Features
82
Overall
64

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Announced September 2017
  • Old Model is Sony RX10 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-S200 was announced 8 years earlier than the RX10 IV which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S200 grades vs the RX10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony RX10 IV

 EX-S200 RX10 IV 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Casio EX-S200

 RX10 IV EX-S200 
AnnouncedSeptember 2017August 2010More modern by 86 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1440k230kClearer display (+1210k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV

 EX-S200 RX10 IV 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 and the RX10 IV.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and RX10 IV is 96 and 52 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and RX10 IV.

All in all, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX10 IV will produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography details
Sony RX10 IV Portrait photography details
35
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
71
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography info
Sony RX10 IV Street photography info
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
64
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
exports RAW formats
has focus by touch
environment sealing
heavier than average in class (1,095g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography details
Sony RX10 IV Sports photography details
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
76
great zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (24.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Travel photography camera
65
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
56
environment sealing
has bluetooth
has focus by touch
good MP (20MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (1,095g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography features
Sony RX10 IV Landscape photography features
42
manual focus
quite wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
62
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Sony RX10 IV
29
quite wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic port
29
quite wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has mic port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
display is not selfie friendly
heavier than average in class (1,095 grams)
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sony RX10 IV
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
General Information
Make Casio Sony
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-08-03 2017-09-12
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 50 125
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 315
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 1,440k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed - 24.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/2000s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132g (0.29 lb) 1095g (2.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $1,698