Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66ec3/66ec316340c681a5b653dffd1598d7db3bc6344d" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front"
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-S200 was revealed 7 months after the W320 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 scores versus the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony W320
EX-S200 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Casio EX-S200
W320 | EX-S200 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony W320
EX-S200 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 versus the W320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f377c/f377c67fd107abfba5e3d03a4665dba348eea29b" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and W320 is 96 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d16b/0d16b786e59dbfc9ea24edd942ea02750cf4f166" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and W320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you should expect similar quality of photos although you may want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-S200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09287/092877c48d958dd8b782353c6ba9dfced714ce0f" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e07e/6e07e3f9286e893f15b9ca1323a920050434daa7" alt="Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 117 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $0 | $269 |