Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2010
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Overview

The following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-S200 was revealed 7 months after the W320 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 scores versus the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony W320

 EX-S200 W320 
AnnouncedAugust 2010January 2010Newer by 7 months
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Casio EX-S200

 W320 EX-S200 

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony W320

 EX-S200 W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display measurement
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

See the Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 versus the W320.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and W320 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and W320.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you should expect similar quality of photos although you may want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-S200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography highlights
Sony W320 Portrait photography highlights
35
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (14MP)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
28
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
Sony W320 as a Street photography camera
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography factors
Sony W320 Sports photography factors
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
26
megapixel count decent (14MP)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Sony W320 Travel photography details
65
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
66
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography details
Sony W320 Landscape photography details
42
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging info
Sony W320 Vlogging info
29
reasonably wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic socket
26
reasonably wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sony W320
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sony
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-08-03 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 1s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 grams (0.29 lb) 117 grams (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $269