Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Sony SLT-A33 front
Portability
67
Imaging
53
Features
80
Overall
63

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Sony A33
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Announced August 2010
  • Successor is Sony A35
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Overview

The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-S200 and Sony A33, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the A33 (14MP) is pretty similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and A33 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The EX-S200 was introduced within a month of the A33 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-S200 grades against the A33 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony A33

 EX-S200 A33 

Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Casio EX-S200

 A33 EX-S200 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony A33

 EX-S200 A33 
AnnouncedAugust 2010August 2010Similar age
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S200 provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony A33 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-S200 and Sony A33 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-S200 versus the A33.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and A33 is 96 and 67 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and A33.

As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 comes with the tinier sensor which should make obtaining bokeh harder.

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A33 as a Portrait photography camera
34
has manual focus
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
71
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography factors
Sony A33 Street photography factors
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
76
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography highlights
Sony A33 Sports photography highlights
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
low battery power (340 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography details
Sony A33 Travel photography details
65
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
61
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
does not have Timelapse recording
low battery power (340 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography factors
Sony A33 Landscape photography factors
42
has manual focus
quite wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
66
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
low battery power (340 per charge)
does not have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Vlogging information
Sony A33 Vlogging information
29
quite wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone support
77
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Sony A33
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Sony SLT-A33
General Information
Make Casio Sony
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Sony SLT-A33
Type Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2010-08-03 2010-08-24
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Total lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 grams (0.29 pounds) 500 grams (1.10 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 591
Other
Battery life - 340 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $230