Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-S200 and Sony A35, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the A35 (16MP) is fairly similar but the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-S200 was unveiled 13 months before the A35 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-S200 scores vs the A35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Sony SLT-A35. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Sony A35
| EX-S200 | A35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Casio EX-S200
| A35 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Sony A35
| EX-S200 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Sony A35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the A35.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and A35 is 96 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and A35.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-S200 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A35 will deliver extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S200 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lb) | 415g (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $598 |